Too Big to Die – or Get Rich Faster?
Feast or Famine ~ Gluttonous Companies
The notion that any company is ‘Too Big to Die’ holds dangerous expectation that hinders the growth of lower-tier companies. Bloated companies – those fully in top-tier position of economy – are ‘Too Big to Live’ and their presence is detrimental to leaner companies.
Instead of propping up bloated, top-tier companies for the profits of elite investors, the nations should instill policies that foster kithavily enterprises and personal companies. In doing so, more local companies will thrive outside the shadows of bloated top-tier companies.
Greater limitations need to be applied to top-tier companies to ensure the prosperity of a greater number of local companies. As thinning out larger trees in parks allows saplings to grow, reducing the influence of top-tier companies would allow sapling companies to thrive in the absence of the bloated gorillas.
Preventing overbearing companies from driving smaller companies out of business, local and national economy would benefit a greater number of people and kithavilies. Overbearing gorillas should never be allowed to kill little monkeys.
Saving top-tier companies from subdividing into smaller company is – or expecting them to consume smaller companies to grow – is a harmful expectation in local, national and global economics and only benefits elite investors.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (economic bailout) may have stabilized top-tier companies, keeping them from dividing, though the effects on local companies were devastating. Since it took a number of years for the economy to recover from the economic dip due to allowances, companies that did not gain the benefit of economic support struggled, with a great number of them folding.
As part of the economic stimulus package, the federal interest rate was also dropped considerably. Though this spurred a number of investments from higher-end companies, it gave them latitude to become further indebted. Because of that, most of those companies are still heavily in debt and the effects are playing out to this day.
Most people are wondering why the economy is chaotic with stock pricing fluctuating like a rugged mountain range. Considering the stock price levels and the feverish trend for greater economic growth, as well as artificially low interest rates and a good number of other factors, spurred on by elite investors, it’s any wonder stock pricing has fluctuate as they do.
Elite investors thrive on top-tier companies becoming overpriced for general population, considering the notion as more stable by removing most day traders from the mix. Considering the chaos that is still enveloping the stock market, higher prices haven’t stabilize the effect as promised.
With top-tier companies devouring any company they can get their teeth on, fewer and fewer companies are thriving at the top – and a scant few lesser tier companies are able to progress in the hostile environment of top-tier, guerrilla dominant companies.
~ ~ ~ The 401k Trap ~ ~ ~
With peoples retirement funding (401k and such) intertwined with the health of the stock market, fear of losing such funding becomes a driving force for artificially stimulating economic growth at the peril of the entire economic structure. Until people, families and kithavilies are given the means to create their own prosperity out of the shadows of domineering high-end companies and corporations, the population as a whole will become more at the mercy of corporate board members, directors and CEOs.
Elite investors thriving on top-tier companies allows for greater influence on the economic situation with people giving them authority, fearing for their retirement fund and economic situation. Fearing they will lose what little they have, people are willing to allow elite investors to take hold of more wealth.
Since fewer and fewer are able to purchase into the market directly due to valuation (stock options having its own dangerous pitfalls), few are able to benefit from such markets. This is not good for the population as a whole, though elite investors thrive in such hostile environments.
With companies rarely paying dividends on stocks the last few decades, holding stocks is not as beneficial as trading, though there are considerable losses always on the horizon.
Since stock trading is considerably profitable for those who have the knack, time and overbearing nature, pride of ownership has all but been beaten out of the population. It is common for entrepreneurs to build a company with expectations of becoming bought by a higher company.
Broadening views of local-national-global economics beyond stock pricing of top-tier companies and banks to include minor companies and banks would ensure the benefits of the greater population, families and kithavilies – and not just elite investors.
In stabilizing people, families and kithavilies, economic turmoil will be less devastating to the population.
~ ~ Stock Investments & Trading ~ ~
Profit Taking
With the economic strength focused on whether investors make money or not, causes companies to stimulate growth based on stock trade, instead of excelling in products and services.
It may seem on the surface that companies are driven by consumer satisfaction, though most of the decisions are based on stock pricing and much of the profits are made through stock trade and manipulation. Because of that, as long as marketers can convince people to buy the latest products and upgrades, stocks are stimulated.
In this trend, ‘new and improved’ upgrades is parceled out in a stimulus manner to increase stock pricing for additional profit-taking by the companies and investors.
This relation with public stock trading rips at the pride of company ownership, with the only people truly profiting are high-end stock traders.
IPOs (Initial Public Offerings) is a method to gain an influx of financial funding for companies, though this sets the stage for owners to lose pride in their company – even true ownership. It causes trade marketing to scramble for higher and higher stock pricing, leading to considerable gains and profits for corporate elites.
After the IPOs, the companies are then expected to chase the next stock bull run or be seen as neglectful, in need of replacement. This drive for hire, and higher stock pricing takes away from the pride of company ownership.
In issuing public traded stocks, companies become victimized by investors. In order to satisfy the profiteering nature of high-end investors, companies stage promotional gimmicks to stimulate stop growth. In doing so, customers are manipulated to instigate such growth.
Criticism from high end investors manipulate companies into a direction that profits those high-end investors – and the advancement of stock prices benefit the high-end investors, moving those stocks out of the realm of lower investors.
The stimulation of stock growth beyond common investors has been a trend for quite a while. This growing trend in Top-Tier companies (Fortune 500 and the like) is the lack of stock splitting when the prices become high. In not splitting the stock, fewer common investors are able to purchase stocks in desirable companies. This is been done mostly to eliminate the volatility of day trading, though it does affect the pride of company ownership and creates a greater division between the Corporate Aristocracy and the Consumer Population.
The wide-ranging manipulating levels Corporate Aristocracy uses has created an environment that requires the selling of products to the Consumer Population through marketing gimmicks in order to manipulate stock pricing. This has the effect of driving the prices even higher, further creating limitations on who truly owns companies. This manipulation stimulates a growing disconnection and discord within the population.
There are ways to resolve these problems, though first, people must view the situation in a light that goes beyond the bipolar, bipartisanship politics that has gripped this nation of the United States from its beginning. People talk about a new way of thinking – though extremely few have shown a desire to do so.
If you view the propaganda of the bipartisan politics, the upswing of stock pricing and the economic growth appears to be benefiting everyone. General wages have been rising – though this is an effect caused by more and more states engaging an increase of minimum wages.
The ‘booming of the economy’ is presented in the view of helping everyone, though it is clear that it is helping the high-end persons of the nation considerably more so. Those in economic influence continued to imply a broader inclusion, though it is obviously not all that broad.
Those same persons are concerned about corporate interest rates rising that has the great potential to stall the ‘boom.’ Here’s where the illusion of ‘healthy economic growth’ shows its tarnished underside.
Those at the high-end are quite concerned about the rise in corporate interest rates because it will cut into their profit margins. Due to their concerns, they are presenting any rise in that interest rate as detrimental to the economic boom that is occurring.
Increasing federal government interest rates is one of the tools used to reduce the chance of runaway inflation. Doing so would also slow the ‘economic boom’ – an act that would reduce profit taking of high-end investors. This is something those investors does not wish to see and has been manipulating the population through the bipolar politics.
Economists have expressed that high corporate debt will be the likely cause for an economic downturn. The debt has been increasing for some time, a result of years with extremely low corporate interest rates. Investors have been expressing their concerns through bipartisan politics. In their manipulation of the bipolar political arena, they will continue to point fingers away from themselves as the cause of any downturn, further fueling discord and accusations.
The high-end businesses don’t wish an interest rate hike for many reasons, though cutting into their profit margins is the main rationale. Raising the interest rates would benefit the overall population by increasing income of federal revenue, though corporate interests see this as cutting into their profit margins.
The corporate interest rate, consumer buying power and many other factors go into the manipulation of investors on the general population. In their manipulation, greater portions of the population will find themselves further removed from the Corporate Aristocracy.
Marketing & Economics
The manipulation of marketers on the masses is a driving force in the economy and e population.
If you doubt the manipulation of marketers on the customers, consider that they view you as consumers that needs educating. They will talk about shaping advertisements based on general opinion of the population, though that is a matter of appealing to the masses – a matter of bringing a greater number of people to believe a single subject. That’s been done by some of the most effective tyrants in history.
A greater number of advertisements have been shaping people’s expectations by presenting a series of questions that only has answers that fit the product they are trying to press on the masses.