Political Parties Control on the Populace

In democratic societies, political parties became guiding forces throughout populations, more often setting directions within governance based on narrow opinions and selfish agendas of a mere few.  Such guidance is fueled by executives of political parties – no matter what titles each leadership executive may hold.

For Democratic and Republican parties, application of views is piped through the DNC and RNC; each compelling the populace to support their narratives.  Both Democratic and Republican National Committees influence people by guiding their flocks, pressing views in manners to create, even force, popular consensus. This pressure becomes more effective when they imply Other People are wrong, immoral, distasteful, despicable or some deplorable perspective the DNC and RNC can make Their People believe. Party executives also work to draw people into their congregation, influencing them to hate those Other People.

Influential persons and entities associated with the RNC and DNC press their agendas through those political Committees and other outlets, each finding greater means to control populations.  For this to function effectively, political parties have to gather large percentages of the population, bringing them in line for them to control; and politicians and executives of those parties must prevent people from questioning their agenda.

The more people any political party can gather, the more they can flaunt ‘Popularity,’ pointing to the masses who are gathered for their causes – whether those causes are decent or not.  As crowds gather, more and more people will collect in mass, a trend seen generation after generation.

Virtually every person gravitates towards crowds, mostly so they’re not left out.  We sapient humans are social creatures and gather in groups; larger the better; becoming like flocks of sheep, even herds of cattle, for party executives to influence.

As many psychologists have shown, crowds take on a consciousness of their own; a conscience easily guided by the few who can manipulate collectives.  That leaves people and the populace vulnerable to manipulation, with very few of the population knowing how they became like sheep and cattle.

    ~ ~ ~

Even lower executives become vulnerable to manipulation.  There are many, whether high or low, who believe they’re enlightened beyond any form of manipulation; believing they’re free from such bonds.

To gain true enlightenment, people must see how the masses are manipulated and guided to distrust, dislike and hate other groups of people.  To be enlightened, people also must question the validity of accusations leveled at opposition by party politicians and executives.

Those who are truly enlightened would dig deep into volumes of books and articles related to broad views so that they discover verifiable evidence related to accusations leveled towards others.  Each enlightened person is to ensure they understand the agendas of those who are bringing accusations, ensuring those persons are decent and not acting in selfish manners.

Each enlightened person must discount accusations when they lack verifiable evidence they, themselves are unable to discover through deep research – evidence gained from many broad views, as well as peer-checked by many sources.  Such research takes considerably more effort than most people will apply – hours upon hours each week that would take them from entertaining distractions; something most people seem to avoid.

Most people won’t delve deeply, seeing their enjoyment of entertainment as more important.  For simplicity of their own lives, they would sooner believe accusations coming from popular party politicians and executives than be truly enlightened – taking time to do self-applied research of the many views.

        Most people will find all sorts of reasons not to conduct research. In doing so, they

        remain ignorant and vulnerable to manipulation.

Unscrupulous politicians and party executives guiding populations know extremely few people will conduct any form of concerted research, let alone something deep enough to recognize mass-population manipulation.  Because of the time it takes to conduct research, unscrupulous manipulators and influencers of populations are capable of guiding people in ways extremely few would recognize.  This also occurs within commerce.

Very few will read volumes of material needed to recognize even the simplest of manipulation applied by party executives, including manipulation from party-oriented politicians.  Only the most diligent of freethinking people will delve into the nature of conflicting articles to sort out agendas and viewpoints.

Such in-depth research takes tremendous amount of time, and videos are poor substitutes for hard reading. Videos can help bring understanding, though only when coupled with in-depth reading of broad-ranging views, as well as involving oneself in many, deeply intellectual conversations discussing broad, multi-viewed topics.

Extremely few executives of political parties – or party-oriented politicians – want people to delve into learning about how unscrupulous party members manipulate populations.

As executives guide their flocks, they imply nothing is good about anyone who is in opposition.  Those who resist their authority are despicable and must be shunned.  In that, executives and politicians must discredit opposition, using their manipulation of the collective to enforce their position – their authority.

Accusations of wrongdoing are leveled against opposition; something often flung in such volumes the masses within crowds will find something to dislike – even if such accusations have no quantifiable evidence to support hateful declarations.  Even worse, simply highlighting differences in lifeways is enough to instill hatred, and those manipulating crowds know how to use the hatred of Other People to control the masses.

    ~ ~ ~

Each of us must be highly wary of any person who accuses wrongdoings of the opposition without presenting fully quantifiable evidence – evidence that is easily discovered by checking many credible sources. Credibility of those presenting accusations must be scrutinized.

To be freethinking, each of us must delve deeper into the motivations of leaderships; not merely accepting mere accusations leveled at in opposition because it ‘Sounds Good.’  Such leveling is simple guidance of the populace against the Other People.

Always be wary of those who claim ‘Exclusive Sources’ of evidence, or presentations that are highly focused on limited perspectives, prevent varying views from being applied.  Also, if they promise ‘Evidence is coming,’ they’re feeding a fishing line; and you’re the fish. Don’t be the fish.

Another common trick in guiding populations is the occasional presentation of opposition in order to be seen as though they’re ‘Bringing balancing perspectives.’  More often than not, this form of manipulation is used to present the opposition as a way to stage disqualification of opposing perspectives.  When this is applied, leadership of congregations will not allow quantifiable evidence to be presented by the opposition, and quickly shift conversations to general rhetoric.

        Pay attention to how interviews are conducted, as well as how each in the

        conversation reacts to quantifiable evidence and who brings them.

Remember, simple implications are enough for crowds, congregations, mobs, herds or flocks to become riled against those in opposition.  Just general fear and hatred of those Other People is enough to splinter societies. We must all work to prevent such manipulations.

When any party politician or executive wishes to discredit opposition, simply declaring accusations of misdeeds is enough to place wedges within the population.  Applying such discredit towards opposing groups and leaders – even bringing forth Special Hearings to do so – enables unscrupulous politicians and party executives to guide their flocks into a frenzy; and in doing so, break the synergy of societies.

Such behaviors are conducted to rile supporters into frenzy – whether such accusations have validity or quantifiable evidence to present.  It has been shown that very few accusations have verifiable evidence, though just making accusations at rallies is enough to fracture societies.

Once fractured, it takes a great amount of time and effort to reestablish continuity and synergy within populations, societies, regions and nations.  Don’t be gullible like others within crowds. Be the truly freethinking person you believe you are.

Again, remember, just declaring misdeeds should never be enough for flocks to believe the opposition is faulty. Gullible people don’t need strong evidence to be manipulated.  This goes beyond rallies.  The simplest of videos carefully presenting imagery and rhetoric is enough to guide most people, reeling them into believing the rhetoric.

The mere desire for people to be accepted within crowds is enough for them to accept inflated accusations and simple, flashy presentations declaring, ‘Those Other People are despicable.’  Those of the congregation don’t wish to be excluded, so they’ll accept the manipulation.

As manipulation of the masses progresses, party politicians and executives grasp ever-expanding authority, escalating accusations against opposition, further advancing their control on the populace.  Knowing crowds will support them—even if no corroborating evidence is available—enables unscrupulous party politicians and executives to take control of the populace through ever-increasing accusations leveled at those Other People.

    ~ ~ ~

There are many unscrupulous, selfish, cheating politicians and executives claiming to be working for the people and nations. Those Cheaters are often the most boisterous, spewing tremendous amount of accusations.

Party politicians and executives will level accusations that seem horrendous, so to deflect observation of misdeeds they, themselves are conducting.  The nature of ‘Cheater Syndrome’ shows how those who speak the loudest are so much more likely to be the ones who are concealing even greater wrongdoings.  Those persons will lash out at other people, so the populace will not consider them as being flawed in more horrendous manners.

        Pay attention to who’s griping the most, and you’ll see the truth of that.

This leads to exposing those who are truly conducting wrongdoing – something that each of us within these populations and societies must do carefully.  Proper exposure must be conducted in a calm presentation, bringing forth verifiable evidence.

Whenever provable misdeeds are discovered, methodical presentation of such evidence is to be given to judicial authorities, so due process may take place – a process that takes considerable time to conduct properly.

Such slow processes may not be satisfying to angry flocks.  Unscrupulous leadership knows that nature and is ready to manipulate mobs, crowds, herds and flocks to indicate favoritism, removing sensible thinking from their congregations.

Party politicians and executives may not like due process and will strive to manipulate people to see it as unjust in some manner. However, we as freethinking people are to insist on it.  Don’t let party politicians or executives prevent us from scrutinizing agendas of party leaders.

Understanding that unscrupulous executives becoming exposed would be inclined to cast disparaging remarks at those presenting verifiable charges is a sign of panic; and each of us should see it as the brat-like lashing out bullies employ when they are threatened.  Watch and see how their mudslinging lacks quantifiable evidence, as well as how those in support of attacked politicians and executives disregard verifiable evidence brought forth.  Such mudslinging of accusations will continue to escalate until truth is even harder to discern.

        People within supporting flocks will not see faults they or their leaders possess; nor will

        those people consider how they’ve been manipulated in the first place.

One would think quantifiable evidence would be required for the populace to accept accusations.  However, history has shown that to be untrue.  When people are involved with flocks – even as part of political parties – they will disregard quantifiable evidence, should such evidence reflect badly on their congregation. ‘They, themselves can never be at fault.’

The masses are easily manipulated when flock leadership brings accusations against opposition.  Those same people would disregard due process of legal institutions, should it not favor them.

Mob rules have always been disruptive to legal process. That’s why legal courts are not a function of popular control or viewpoints.

        Should legal courts become influenced by popular views, proper justice will never be achieved.

Public Special Hearings instigated by party politicians and executives against members of other political parties should always be questioned by each of us within the populace.  Each person must demand that each Special Hearing present quantifiable evidence; and the process must be conducted with proper, calm decency – not allowing the spewing willy-nilly accusations.

        Decency should be instilled deeply within political parties, and calm discussions

        of all views are to be recognized – and not the spewing of past rhetoric.

If there is provable evidence of misdeeds of politicians and executives within political parties, people supporting those parties must implore party leadership to rectify the situation. Also, misdeeds of other parties should be exposed along with the presentation of quantifiable evidence; and honorable leadership within parties harboring those conducting misdeeds must act to correct faults. This should be done to instill honor within political parties.

If truly illegal matters are involved, verifiable evidence is to be presented to the courts. Such presentations must be conducted in respectable manner.  Furthermore, such presentations would have greater effect if applied by the party who harbors persons who have conducted such illegal acts to show they have honor to the public.

This is not to say politicians, executives or crowds should be looking for ‘Scapegoats’ to present, as though they’re ‘Being Honorable.’  Honor comes from calm presentation of verifiable, quantifiable evidence and true due process; not bloodletting to appease the masses.

However exposed, all truly illegal misdeeds need to be settled in non-partial courts separate from political parties. Only then, is there a chance for true justice.

        As long as political parties strive to become part of the justice process,

        there will never be true justice.

Also; having more political parties within societies strengthens democracies for all unique peoples. In having more parties, there would be less chance of one becoming disruptive to societies; or for them to take over the nation.

Other parties would have a greater chance of bringing synergetic balance to societies. Bringing more parties into active service—not just existing at the fringes—would disrupt the nature of bipolar, two-party governance prevalent in these modern nations.

When there are more views accepted within societies, unscrupulous activities of a flock of people will not be able to disrupt the populace as effectively, and synergy could be achieved.  Two opposing political parties are not healthy for societies. It takes more to prevent those opposing forces from manipulating the bulk of the population against each other, if there were more parties involved.

Let us within the many populations of societies become aware of how a few unscrupulous politicians and executives within political parties have manipulated the populace.  We must demand quantifiable evidence to be presented when true misdeeds and illegal acts are discovered.

Let us not become ‘Parrots’ of political party rhetoric.  Let us prevent party leadership from striving for personal glory and authority at the expense of all unique peoples. Be the truly freethinking people you claim to be.

BCW-JZ

© August 2023.

Complementary Article:  Why Seven Political Parties?